Press Releases

WASHINGTON – As negotiations over the next COVID-19 relief package continue today, Rep. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) led over 100 of their colleagues, representing a geographically and ideologically diverse section of the Democratic caucus, in urging Congressional leadership not to strip survival checks from millions who utilize the checks to help them withstand this devastating crisis. 

“Reducing eligibility of economic impact payments would exclude many people from crucial, much-needed relief. Economic impact payments would likely use 2019 tax data to measure an individual’s income. However, this data does not reflect the fact that millions of people lost their jobs in 2020, due to COVID-19—the very condition that necessitates survival checks. In addition, millions more suffered reduction in hours or pay, experienced contracts being canceled, or lost a business.  Data from people who filed for unemployment shows that more than 20 percent of those earning between $50,000 and $70,000 were food insecure. This is a 16 percent increase from 2019 and explains why food banks across the country are struggling to serve communities,” the Members wrote. “For the millions of people nationwide who are unemployed, economic impact payments are survival checks. Indeed, they may be the only form of relief that people receive, in particular among communities of color that face barriers to obtain assistance. Narrowing eligibility requirements despite continued bipartisan support in the 117^th Congress, such as with the recently introduced Coronavirus Assistance for American Families Act, H.R. 795, would risk providing struggling families and an economy in turmoil with too little support. We must ensure robust access to these survival checks to ensure an equitable and robust economic recovery for those individuals affected and the families that depend on them.”

The full text of the letter can be found below or here.

February 9, 2021

Dear Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader Schumer, Leader McConnell, and Leader McCarthy:

            As people across the country struggle to pay rent and put food on the table, we write to express our strong opposition to reducing access to economic impact payments in the next COVID-19 relief package. Narrowing eligibility requirements for these Economic Impact Payments (“survival checks”) from previously established levels found in the bipartisan CARES Act and the second stimulus package will hurt millions of families and our nation’s recovery.

Reducing eligibility of economic impact payments would exclude many people from crucial, much-needed relief. Economic impact payments would likely use 2019 tax data to measure an individual’s income. However, this data does not reflect the fact that millions of people lost their jobs in 2020, due to COVID-19—the very condition that necessitates survival checks.  In addition, millions more suffered reduction in hours or pay, experienced contracts being canceled or lost a business.  Data from people who filed for unemployment shows that more than 20 percent of those earning between $50,000 and $70,000 were food insecure. This is a 16 percent increase from 2019 and explains why food banks across the country are struggling to serve communities.

In addition, survival checks are the sole opportunity for many people to bridge the economic crisis they face. Only 24 percent of people who have lost work have received unemployment insurance. This number, though alarming, certainly is not surprising. Many workers were ineligible for unemployment because they had to stay home and take care of their children or felt unsafe returning to their workplace due to either the difficulties of maintaining physical distancing or reckless workplace safety policies. Others left out include those who were already experiencing long-term unemployment as well as young people who did not have jobs prior to the pandemic, such as recent graduates. Many others have experienced difficulty navigating the unemployment system or, in some cases, earned so little that they did not qualify for the unemployment insurance threshold in their state. 

The COVID-19 pandemic has financially devastated millions of people across the country, across income backgrounds. Sixty-three percent of Americans report living paycheck to paycheck since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Among this population, 53 percent say they were not living paycheck to paycheck before the pandemic hit. Close to half say that they have exhausted their emergency savings, and eight out of 10 say they would not be able to cover the cost of a $500 emergency.

Black, Indigenous, people of color, and women have been particularly hard hit as they experience steep declines in employment. Workers of color are frequently the first fired and the last hired. In December 2020, 100 percent of the 140,000 jobs lost were held by women. Black, Latinx, and Asian women are bearing the brunt of this as they are experiencing higher rates of long-term unemployment.Yet even as these communities experience higher rates of unemployment, they are less likely to receive unemployment insurance. Research shows that Black and Latinx workers’ unemployment claims are rejected at a disproportionately higher rate compared to White workers. 

For the millions of people nationwide who are unemployed, economic impact payments are survival checks. Indeed, they may be the only form of relief that people receive, in particular among communities of color that face barriers to obtain assistance. Narrowing eligibility requirements despite continued bipartisan support in the 117^th Congress, such as with the recently introduced Coronavirus Assistance for American Families Act, H.R. 795, would risk providing struggling families and an economy in turmoil with too little support. We must ensure robust access to these survival checks to ensure an equitable and robust economic recovery for those individuals affected and the families that depend on them.

Sincerely,

Lisa Blunt Rochester

Pramila Jayapal

Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. Pete Aguilar, Nanette Diaz Barragán, Karen Bass, Joyce Beatty, Donald S. Beyer Jr., Earl Blumenauer, Suzanne Bonamici, Jamaal Bowman, Ed.D., Brendan Boyle, Anthony G. Brown, Cori Bush, G. K. Butterfield, André Carson, Kathy Castor, Joaquin Castro, Judy Chu, David N. Cicilline Yvette D. Clarke Emanuel Cleaver, II J. Luis Correa, Charlie Crist, Jason Crow, Madeleine Dean, Diana DeGette, Val Demings, Mark DeSaulnier, Debbie Dingell, Veronica Escobar, Adriano Espaillat, Lizzie Fletcher, Bill Foster, Lois Frankel, Ruben Gallego, Sylvia R. Garcia, Jesús G. “Chuy” García Jimmy Gomez, Raúl M. Grijalva, Alcee L. Hastings, Jahana Hayes, Steven Horsford, Jared Huffman, Sheila Jackson Lee, Sara Jacobs, Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Jr., Mondaire Jones, Robin L. Kelly, Ro Khanna, Raja Krishnamoorthi, Ann McLane Kuster, John B. Larson, Brenda L. Lawrence, Barbara Lee, Teresa Leger Fernández,  Andy Levin, Mike Levin, Alan Lowenthal, Carolyn B. Maloney, Lucy McBath, Donald McEachin, James P. McGovern, Jerry McNerney, Gregory W. Meeks, Grace Meng, Gwen Moore, Jerrold Nadler, Grace F. Napolitano, Marie Newman, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Tom O'Halleran, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Donald M. Payne, Jr., Chellie Pingree, Mark Pocan, Katie Porter, Ayanna Pressley, Lucille Roybal-Allard, Raul Ruiz,Mary Gay Scanlon, Jan Schakowsky, Terri Sewell, Albio Sires, Adam Smith, Darren Soto, Jackie Speier, Haley Stevens, Mark Takano, Mike Thompson, Rashida Tlaib, Norma J. Torres, Ritchie Torres, Lori Trahan, Juan Vargas, Marc Veasey, Filemon Vela, Nydia M. Velázquez, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Maxine Waters, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Susan Wild, Nikema Williams 

###